It sounds like a
patronising concept, a code used by foreigners for the phenomenon that “they”
are always late. But no, it’s not just foreigners who use the term – it’s a
term widely used by Africans themselves, to describe their strange timekeeping
habits. Is it a cultural phenomenon, or is it due to over-commitment, laziness,
lack of consideration, or all of the above?
I remember that when I
used to work in Nairobi that my American boss, who was a scientist by training,
and knew full well about timekeeping, was always late for appointments with
government people. Possibly he was demonstrating that more than one can play at
that game.
The prevalence of
African time definitely varies between countries. In Zimbabwe, for example,
it’s not really in fashion. I recall how City Councillors who were late for a
meeting by even a second were excluded by the closure, ON THE DOT, of the
council chamber doors. And it worked – after the first one or two cases of
missing meetings casual timekeeping was transformed into meticulous
timekeeping. The Congo, though, is greatly enamoured of African time.
Take the recent case
where are group of entrepreneurs was invited to be briefed for an important
business opportunity by the Mayor. They received invitations, imploring them to
be present by 9.00 a.m. We decided we should meet him before it started so that
we could run over the planned programme with him. Knowing that most people
would turn up late, we proposed that we meet him at 9.00 so that we would have
at least a quarter of an hour before it started. No, no, he said, we should
meet at 8.30.
We were marginally impressed
that he was keen to get the meeting started on time and arrived punctually.
When did he arrive? Forty minutes late. Then, following our little meeting, he
vanished, and only appeared for the “important” meeting, supposed to start at
9.00, at 10.51. No apologies.
It’s not just being
late for meetings – it’s any concept of planning the weeks and days in advance
which doesn’t work so well. By way of a contrast, I was appalled when, in
Holland, it was normally impossible to get an appointment to see someone with
less than a week’s notice – even the Director of your own institution who was
working just down the passage.
Back to the Congo:
many have been the frustrations when international experts make an appointment
several weeks in advance only to find that, at the appointed time, the person
concerned is not just late, but not even in town. “No, you see,” goes the
explanation, “he was called to Kinshasa (to see the Minister, for a workshop,
etc etc).” Indeed it’s usually much easier and more efficient to make an
appointment fifteen minutes ahead than fifteen days ahead. People are free with
their phone numbers, and all it takes is one call and you’re in.
The downside of this
is that someone else is, because of your appointment, bumped from an opportunity
to meet the big man, and has to hang around for another few hours, if not more.
In the end it’s all a
power play. By being willing to see you at short notice the big man is showing
you respect, and in these matters a personal relationship – even such a tenuous
one, which has been established by nothing more than a phone call – counts for
far more than the dead entry in his secretary’s diary.
No comments:
Post a Comment